在英语学习的过程，大家想要尽可能的提高英语水平的话，进行英语演讲不仅是对自己的一种气场胆量的锻炼，同时也是对自己英语水平提高的好办法，奇文共欣赏，疑义相如析，下面是勤劳的编辑给大伙儿收集整理的ted演讲稿2022【最新7篇】，欢迎阅读，希望对大家有所启发。
简介：残奥会短跑冠军aimeemullins天生没有腓骨，从小就要学习靠义肢走路和奔跑。如今，她不仅是短跑选手、演员、模特，还是一位稳健的演讲者。她不喜欢字典中“disabled”这个词，因为负面词汇足以毁掉一个人。但是，坦然面对不幸，你会发现等待你的是更多的机会。
i'd like to share with you a discovery that i made a few months ago whilewriting an article for italian wired. i always keep my thesaurus handy wheneveri'm writing anything, but i'd already finished editing the piece, and i realizedthat i had never once in my life looked up the word "disabled" to see what i'dfind.
let me read you the entry. "disabled, adjective: crippled, helpless,useless, wrecked, stalled, maimed, wounded, mangled, lame, mutilated, run-down,worn-out, weakened, impotent, castrated, paralyzed, handicapped, senile,decrepit, laid-up, done-up, done-for, done-in cracked-up, counted-out; see alsohurt, useless and weak. antonyms, healthy, strong, capable." i was reading thislist out loud to a friend and at first was laughing, it was so ludicrous, buti'd just gotten past "mangled," and my voice broke, and i had to stop andcollect myself from the emotional shock and impact that the assault from thesewords unleashed.
you know, of course, this is my raggedy old thesaurus so i'm thinking thismust be an ancient print date, right? but, in fact, the print date was the early1980s, when i would have been starting primary school and forming anunderstanding of myself outside the family unit and as related to the other kidsand the world around me. and, needless to say, thank god i wasn't using athesaurus back then. i mean, from this entry, it would seem that i was born intoa world that perceived someone like me to have nothing positive whatsoever goingfor them, when in fact, today i'm celebrated for the opportunities andadventures my life has procured.
so, i immediately went to look up the __ online edition, e_pecting to finda revision worth noting. here's the updated version of this unately, it's not much better. i find the last two words under "nearantonyms," particularly unsettling: "whole" and "wholesome."
so, it's not just about the words. it's what we believe about people whenwe name them with these words. it's about the values behind the words, and howwe construct those values. our language affects our thinking and how we view theworld and how we view other people. in fact, many ancient societies, includingthe greeks and the romans, believed that to utter a curse verbally was sopowerful, because to say the thing out loud brought it into e_istence. so, whatreality do we want to call into e_istence: a person who is limited, or a personwho's empowered? by casually doing something as simple as naming a person, achild, we might be putting lids and casting shadows on their power. wouldn't wewant to open doors for them instead?
one such person who opened doors for me was my childhood doctor at the institute in wilmington, delaware. his name was dr. pizzutillo, anitalian american, whose name, apparently, was too difficult for most americansto pronounce, so he went by dr. p. and dr. p always wore really colorful bowties and had the very perfect disposition to work with children.
i loved almost everything about my time spent at this hospital, with thee_ception of my physical therapy sessions. i had to do what seemed likeinnumerable repetitions of e_ercises with these thick, elastic bands --different colors, you know -- to help build up my leg muscles, and i hated thesebands more than anything -- i hated them, had names for them. i hated them. and,you know, i was already bargaining, as a five year-old child, with dr. p to tryto get out of doing these e_ercises, unsuccessfully, of course. and, one day, hecame in to my session -- e_haustive and unforgiving, these sessions -- and hesaid to me, "wow. aimee, you are such a strong and powerful little girl, i thinkyou're going to break one of those bands. when you do break it, i'm going togive you a hundred bucks."
now, of course, this was a simple ploy on dr. p's part to get me to do thee_ercises i didn't want to do before the prospect of being the richestfive-year-old in the second floor ward, but what he effectively did for me wasreshape an awful daily occurrence into a new and promising e_perience for i have to wonder today to what e_tent his vision and his declaration of meas a strong and powerful little girl shaped my own view of myself as aninherently strong, powerful and athletic person well into the future.
this is an e_ample of how adults in positions of power can ignite the powerof a child. but, in the previous instances of those thesaurus entries, ourlanguage isn't allowing us to evolve into the reality that we would all want,the possibility of an inpidual to see themselves as capable. our languagehasn't caught up with the changes in our society, many of which have beenbrought about by technology. certainly, from a medical standpoint, my legs,laser surgery for vision impairment, titanium knees and hip replacements foraging bodies that are allowing people to more fully engage with their abilities,and move beyond the limits that nature has imposed on them -- not to mentionsocial networking platforms allow people to self-identify, to claim their owndescriptions of themselves, so they can go align with global groups of their ownchoosing. so, perhaps technology is revealing more clearly to us now what hasalways been a truth: that everyone has something rare and powerful to offer oursociety, and that the human ability to adapt is our greatest asset.
the human ability to adapt, it's an interesting thing, because people havecontinually wanted to talk to me about overcoming adversity, and i'm going tomake an admission: this phrase never sat right with me, and i always felt uneasytrying to answer people's questions about it, and i think i'm starting to figureout why. implicit in this phrase of "overcoming adversity" is the idea thatsuccess, or happiness, is about emerging on the other side of a challenginge_perience unscathed or unmarked by the e_perience, as if my successes in lifehave come about from an ability to sidestep or circumnavigate the presumedpitfalls of a life with prosthetics, or what other people perceive as mydisability. but, in fact, we are changed. we are marked, of course, by achallenge, whether physically, emotionally or both. and i'm going to suggestthat this is a good thing. adversity isn't an obstacle that we need to getaround in order to resume living our life. it's part of our life. and i tend tothink of it like my shadow. sometimes i see a lot of it, sometimes there's verylittle, but it's always with me. and, certainly, i'm not trying to diminish theimpact, the weight, of a person's struggle.
there is adversity and challenge in life, and it's all very real andrelative to every single person, but the question isn't whether or not you'regoing to meet adversity, but how you're going to meet it. so, our responsibilityis not simply shielding those we care for from adversity, but preparing them tomeet it well. and we do a disservice to our kids when we make them feel thatthey're not equipped to adapt. there's an important difference and distinctionbetween the objective medical fact of my being an amputee and the subjectivesocietal opinion of whether or not i'm disabled. and, truthfully, the only realand consistent disability i've had to confront is the world ever thinking that icould be described by those definitions.
in our desire to protect those we care about by giving them the cold, hardtruth about their medical prognosis, or, indeed, a prognosis on the e_pectedquality of their life, we have to make sure that we don't put the first brick ina wall that will actually disable someone. perhaps the e_isting model of onlylooking at what is broken in you and how do we fi_ it, serves to be moredisabling to the inpidual than the pathology itself.
by not treating the wholeness of a person, by not acknowledging theirpotency, we are creating another ill on top of whatever natural struggle theymight have. we are effectively grading someone's worth to our community. so weneed to see through the pathology and into the range of human capability. and,most importantly, there's a partnership between those perceived deficiencies andour greatest creative ability. so it's not about devaluing, or negating, thesemore trying times as something we want to avoid or sweep under the rug, butinstead to find those opportunities wrapped in the adversity. so maybe the ideai want to put out there is not so much overcoming adversity as it is openingourselves up to it, embracing it, grappling with it, to use a wrestling term,maybe even dancing with it. and, perhaps, if we see adversity as natural,consistent and useful, we're less burdened by the presence of it.
this year we celebrate the 200th birthday of charles darwin, and it was 150years ago, when writing about evolution, that darwin illustrated, i think, atruth about the human character. to paraphrase: it's not the strongest of thespecies that survives, nor is it the most intelligent that survives; it is theone that is most adaptable to change. conflict is the genesis of creation. fromdarwin's work, amongst others, we can recognize that the human ability tosurvive and flourish is driven by the struggle of the human spirit throughconflict into transformation. so, again, transformation, adaptation, is ourgreatest human skill. and, perhaps, until we're tested, we don't know what we'remade of. maybe that's what adversity gives us: a sense of self, a sense of ourown power. so, we can give ourselves a gift. we can re-imagine adversity assomething more than just tough times. maybe we can see it as change. adversityis just change that we haven't adapted ourselves to yet.
i think the greatest adversity that we've created for ourselves is thisidea of normalcy. now, who's normal? there's no normal. there's common, there'stypical. there's no normal, and would you want to meet that poor, beige personif they e_isted? (laughter) i don't think so. if we can change this paradigmfrom one of achieving normalcy to one of possibility -- or potency, to be even alittle bit more dangerous -- we can release the power of so many more children,and invite them to engage their rare and valuable abilities with thecommunity.
anthropologists tell us that the one thing we as humans have alwaysrequired of our community members is to be of use, to be able to 's evidence that neanderthals, 60,000 years ago, carried their elderly andthose with serious physical injury, and perhaps it's because the life e_perienceof survival of these people proved of value to the community. they didn't viewthese people as broken and useless; they were seen as rare and valuable.
a few years ago, i was in a food market in the town where i grew up in thatred zone in northeastern pennsylvania, and i was standing over a bushel oftomatoes. it was summertime: i had shorts on. i hear this guy, his voice behindme say, "well, if it isn't aimee mullins." and i turn around, and it's thisolder man. i have no idea who he is.
and i said, "i'm sorry, sir, have we met? i don't remember meetingyou."
he said, "well, you wouldn't remember meeting me. i mean, when we met i wasdelivering you from your mother's womb." (laughter) oh, that guy. and, but ofcourse, actually, it did click.
this man was dr. kean, a man that i had only known about through mymother's stories of that day, because, of course, typical fashion, i arrivedlate for my birthday by two weeks. and so my mother's prenatal physician hadgone on vacation, so the man who delivered me was a complete stranger to myparents. and, because i was born without the fibula bones, and had feet turnedin, and a few toes in this foot and a few toes in that, he had to be the bearer-- this stranger had to be the bearer of bad news.
he said to me, "i had to give this prognosis to your parents that you wouldnever walk, and you would never have the kind of mobility that other kids haveor any kind of life of independence, and you've been making liar out of me eversince." (laughter) (applause)
the e_traordinary thing is that he said he had saved newspaper clippingsthroughout my whole childhood, whether winning a second grade spelling bee,marching with the girl scouts, you know, the halloween parade, winning mycollege scholarship, or any of my sports victories, and he was using it, andintegrating it into teaching resident students, med students from hahnemannmedical school and hershey medical school. and he called this part of the coursethe _ factor, the potential of the human will. no prognosis can account for howpowerful this could be as a determinant in the quality of someone's life. anddr. kean went on to tell me, he said, "in my e_perience, unless repeatedly toldotherwise, and even if given a modicum of support, if left to their own devices,a child will achieve."
see, dr. kean made that shift in thinking. he understood that there's adifference between the medical condition and what someone might do with it. andthere's been a shift in my thinking over time, in that, if you had asked me at15 years old, if i would have traded prosthetics for flesh-and-bone legs, iwouldn't have hesitated for a second. i aspired to that kind of normalcy backthen. but if you ask me today, i'm not so sure. and it's because of thee_periences i've had with them, not in spite of the e_periences i've had withthem. and perhaps this shift in me has happened because i've been e_posed tomore people who have opened doors for me than those who have put lids and castshadows on me.
see, all you really need is one person to show you the epiphany of your ownpower, and you're off. if you can hand somebody the key to their own power --the human spirit is so receptive -- if you can do that and open a door forsomeone at a crucial moment, you are educating them in the best sense. you'reteaching them to open doors for themselves. in fact, the e_act meaning of theword "educate" comes from the root word "educe." it means "to bring forth whatis within, to bring out potential." so again, which potential do we want tobring out?
there was a case study done in 1960s britain, when they were moving fromgrammar schools to comprehensive schools. it's called the streaming trials. wecall it "tracking" here in the states. it's separating students from a, b, c, dand so on. and the "a students" get the tougher curriculum, the best teachers,etc. well, they took, over a three-month period, d-level students, gave thema's, told them they were "a's," told them they were bright, and at the end ofthis three-month period, they were performing at a-level.
and, of course, the heartbreaking, flip side of this study, is that theytook the "a students" and told them they were "d's." and that's what happened atthe end of that three-month period. those who were still around in school,besides the people who had dropped out. a crucial part of this case study wasthat the teachers were duped too. the teachers didn't know a switch had beenmade. they were simply told, "these are the 'a-students,' these are the'd-students.'" and that's how they went about teaching them and treatingthem.
so, i think that the only true disability is a crushed spirit, a spiritthat's been crushed doesn't have hope, it doesn't see beauty, it no longer hasour natural, childlike curiosity and our innate ability to imagine. if instead,we can bolster a human spirit to keep hope, to see beauty in themselves andothers, to be curious and imaginative, then we are truly using our power a spirit has those qualities, we are able to create new realities and newways of being.
i'd like to leave you with a poem by a fourteenth-century persian poetnamed hafiz that my friend, jacques dembois told me about, and the poem iscalled "the god who only knows four words": "every child has known god, not thegod of names, not the god of don'ts, but the god who only knows four words andkeeps repeating them, saying, 'come dance with me. come, dance with me. come,dance with me.'"
thank you. (applause)
尊敬的老师，亲爱的同学们：
大家好！
生活在21世纪的我们，整天过着衣食无忧的富足生活。可谓是家中的“小皇帝”“小公主”，真是捧在手里怕碎了，含在嘴里怕化了。然而，即使是这样的生活状况，可是有时我们抱怨命运的不公，不懂得学会珍惜眼前这个大千世界赋予给我们的幸福。
进入初三后，学习负担明显加重，这时营养对我们来说十分重要。晚上，正当我们在知识的海洋里遨游时，妈妈蹑手蹑脚地为我端来一杯热气腾腾的牛奶，并嘱咐我说：“天太晚了，早点休息吧！”一声轻声叮咛如同一股暖流沁入我的心房，身上的严寒全部消失得无影无踪，留在心底的是温暖，是快乐，是幸福。每当回忆起来，想到那时的我对妈妈的态度，心里充满了酸楚。
进入中学校门，面对着全班师生我有自己的发言权，对于我来说，这就是幸福。在班会上，老师让同学门谈谈对学习的看法，幸运的是我被选中。虽然当时心里忐忑不安，不过慢慢之后就好了。我觉得能够敞开心扉，与老师、同学一起探讨交流，这就是幸福。幸福并不一定像花儿一样美丽绽放，并不一定要像拥有海誓山盟的友谊一样万古长青，幸福就是快乐的源泉。
我们身边的幸福比比皆是，有时候，一个小小的手势，一个不起眼的表情，一个很平常的动作，都洋溢着幸福的色彩。幸福停留的时间很短暂，或许像流星一样在眼前瞬间消逝。珍惜眼前所拥有的幸福吧！学会珍惜，懂得珍惜幸福的人，你的生命才会有价值，有意义。我愿幸福如同流星雨一般洒落在我身上，我也会好好体味幸福来临时自己的感受。
“人固有一死，或重于泰山，或轻于鸿毛。”学会珍惜所拥有的幸福的人，你的人生价值重于泰山。
其实，人的一生就是这样的变幻无常，让人捉摸不透，但只要我们懂得抓住机遇，在生活中感受幸福，珍惜幸福，我们的生命就会焕发出无限的精彩。没有拥有，哪来得真情；拥有幸福，珍惜所拥有的幸福，人的一生就变得完美无暇。
愚昧的人类啊！你们不要再执迷不悟了，赶快行动起来吧！眼前的幸福稍纵即逝，难道我们不应该珍惜所拥有的幸福吗？
下面由好范文网的作者为你提供简短的ted演讲稿的写法。
同学们好：
我始终相信任何一个人想要改变自己的人生，想要改变自己的命运，最佳的法宝或者说最好的力量，就是去进行奋斗，我相信在座的各位同学坐在这儿也是来吸取这种力量。
我们每一个人出生都不一样，曾经年轻的时候，抱怨自己生长在一个贫困家庭。曾经年轻的时候抱怨过自己的父母，什么也不能给我。混遍北大整整七年，没有一个女人爱上我的时候，我发现我的很多同学都已经谈了好几次恋爱。有的同学已经娶上了美丽的女人，成立了美好的家庭。当我发现至少每个同学都拥有一个健康身体的时候，我在大学三年级的时候得了肺结核。发现好像所有的生活黑暗和不如意都集中在你一个人身上，幸亏在这样的过程中间我始终没有放弃自己身上唯一的力量，这个力量就是我觉得只要努力，只要奋斗，只要给我足够的时间，我应该能够改变自己的命运，我应该能够让自己的生活变得更好。而这种感觉来自于什么地方呢，就是来自于我从小在农村的那种生活，来自于我自己高考的启示，因为对于我来说，农村孩子长大唯一可能的归宿就是在农村。
我十四岁初中毕业，紧接着命运就对我做出了宣判，当时中国有一个政策，叫做贫下中农子女，一家只能有一个上高中，我姐上了高中，因此就轮不到我。所以其实我在十四岁的时候就认认真真地当过一回农民，在那个时候我就料定了自己这辈子大概只能在农村待着了。但是，老天给了我一个非常好的机会，这个机会就是“四人帮”粉碎以后，教育政策立刻就改变了。我们的初中老师想起了我，说俞敏洪是一直喜欢读书的人，我们是不是可以把他破例地重新放到高中里面来。我妈听说我这个事情以后就非常地兴奋，就找公社大队的领导和学校的校长去不断地说，说我儿子就是可以来的，所以我这辈子我最感激的就是我妈。这就是我的第一次机会，这个不是我奋斗来的，是党和国家给我的。高中毕业的时候，其实整个班全是农民，因为我们就是农村中学，几乎没有一个人会有信心说能考上大学，但是这个时候我碰上了一个好老师。这个老师现在还在南京，已经八十岁了，他在我们复习高考的时候，高二的时候就对我们说了一句话，他说我知道你们在座的小子没有一个能考上大学的`，你们以后一定都是农民，但是我依然要求你们每一个人都去考大学，因为当你们以后回到农村，在田头劳动的时候，当你拄着锄头仰望蓝天，叹息自己命运悲哀的时候，你会想起来，你曾经为了改变自己的命运而奋斗过一次。这句话，我到今天还能记得，大家想想这个印象多深，所以我就认定了自己一定要考大学，第二是我认定了一定要让这个老师失望一次。但这只是一次美好的愿望，我高考第一年出来以后，英语分数只考了33分，尽管当年这个录取的英语分数线也不高，最低大专录取分数线就是我们江苏有一个地区师范学院，只有40分，但是我只考了33分，差了7分，那么我就想，如果我再努力一年，我也许就超过40分了，也许我就进这个大专去了，所以我就边干农活边复习。当时农村连电灯都还没有，在煤油灯底下复习，我就是在高考复习的第二年眼睛近视了，所以第二年去高考的时候考出来，考了55分，我拿到这个分数就特别高兴，为什么呢，我想录取分数线是40分，我是55分，那么我无论如何能够进那个师范学院了。结果分数线下来以后，师范学院的分数线提到了60分，结果又差了5分。高考两次失败以后反而让我增加了信心，我就觉得我非要考第三年不可，所以我就跟我母亲说，第三年我无论如何不干农活，就是说一定要每天，所有的时间都交给我，但是我母亲就说我再给你一年时间，但是我们家确实很穷，所以第三年如果你再考不上的话，你就只能是老老实实回来当农民。所以我第三年就拼命了，每天早上六点起来，晚上十二点睡觉，到第三年参加高考的时候，成绩一出来我就发现我的成绩超过了北京大学的录取分数线，所以后来就有幸跟撒贝宁这样的名人成了校友。其实北京大学这四个字在我脑袋中连闪都没闪过，所以这个例子给同学们又一个启示。什么启示呢？人是要有梦想的，但是你梦想再大，你不去努力是不管用的，就像你爬山的时候，就算你不看那个山头，你只要知道自己在向上爬，只要你爬的路是对的，你到达山头只是一个时间问题。所以，回想我自己的生命，我觉得往往是我生活中带来的一些失败，最后促使我反弹起来，又够着了一个新的目标。
我后来在八十年代末的时候想要出国去读书，但是我联系几十个大学，十几个大学给我发录取通知书，没有一个大学给我发奖学金，都说你只能自己出钱了，而当时我在北大的工资，连奖金带基本工资加起来大概一个月二百块钱，换成美元，三十美元左右。美国的最低学费一个大学大概三万美金，还不算你的生活费，我算了一下，一百年不吃不喝都不够。所以我就想到了我应该要赚更多的钱，怎么赚更多的钱呢？人有了需求就会有想法，有了想法就会有创新。当时刚好中国的外语培训业已经开始轰轰烈烈地起来了，所以我就想我为什么不自己办一个培训班呢？所以就有了新东方。新东方完全不是我理想的产物，有人说俞老师你做新东方，是不是想到了你要为中国教育要做贡献，我想到的就是我要钱。但是今天的我，倒真的实实在在想要为中国的培训事业，和中国的教育做点事情了。为什么？因为你有了这样的实力，你有了这样力量，你有了这样的基础，那自然你就会做，所以我们不用去想太多。很多你没有想到的事情可能会做到，那么为什么会做到呢？就是因为你在不断地改变自己。我们永远不可能说我们站在这个舞台的中央，你就坐着，天上就掉下馅饼来，永远不可能！这个世界上有偶然的运气，有必然的运气，如果你把偶然的运气当做必然的运气，你的生命就会越来越差。但是一个人可以追求必然的运气，什么叫必然的运气，必然运气就是通过自己的努力，踏踏实实地使自己达到了某一个状态，达到了某一个境界，用你这个状态，用你这个境界，用你这个身价去换取你所需要的东西，二十五年前的我在北大拿一百多块钱的工资，这就是我的身价。十五年前的我在新东方我能挣的钱也就是勉强能够养活自己，但是今天的我已经算是中国的在美国比较好的上市公司的老总之一，这个东西是我自己通过努力得来的，所以就不太容易被人剥夺，这个东西是我自己努力得来的，所以我得到了心安理得。这个东西是我努力得来的，所以我更加相信努力的力量，为我自己的后半辈子，我还会去持续不断地继续努力，这就是一个正向的，积极心态的循环。比如说现在的小年轻，我常常觉得很痛苦，为什么呢？第一个，虚荣心特别地强，虚荣心强他关注的什么呢？他关注的不是自己生活的状态，他关注的是周边人跟自己的比较以后，我能不能胜过周边人。比如说中国人结婚以后，中国的女人比自己的丈夫，比的最多的就是你看你看，你的同学怎么怎么样了。你看你看，隔壁的老张怎么样了，完了以后你看你这个窝囊废，到现在还这个样子。她从来不去想这个丈夫本身的好处在什么地方，他的优缺点在什么地方，她是通过个人比较，而比较的标准又特别地庸俗，不是比较对方更有钱，就是比较对方地位更高了。隔壁老张都升了局长了，你这窝囊废，你跟他是同班同学，你现在还是个处长，你看你怎么活的，还不如我嫁给老张算了，好面子就变成了一个人奋斗的动力，而不是说真正的追求幸福的这个心态去变成自己奋斗的动力，所以现在比如说很多年轻人都是贷款，买房买车，完了变成了房奴和车奴，完了生活就被毁掉了。为什么呢？因为你在年纪轻轻的时候就背上了负担以后，你有了一份工作你就不敢扔了，(被)锁在一份工作上当然很好，表面上你很专注，但是另外一个方向就是，你失去了一切让自己的生命可以在其它方向腾飞的机会。我当初之所以敢从北大出来，当初我自信地从北大出来，很简单，我没房没车，北大给我安排的当时的宿舍就是十平米的宿舍，我想这十平米的宿舍不住也罢。所以出来，天地都在我身边，就这种感觉，所以你不怕丢。一个人要不怕丢，因为你怕丢什么东西都不可能得到，你想谈恋爱你就可能失恋了。你想找工作你就可能会失业了。你要想高兴就可能会失落。你想创业你就可能会失败，所以失可能比你得还要更加地重要。
至于说我们的家庭背景，我在大学演讲的时候会遇到很多学生来跟我讨论问题，有同学说俞老师你看，你看我的同学，他们拥有无数的社会资源，现在社会资源越来越集中，完了像我们这样穷人家来的孩子，我们已经争取不到这个机会，这个世界是如此地不公平，我们这些人该怎么办？这个世界从来就没有公平过，即使你到美国，也不可能有这样的公平，但是中国其实还有另外一个好处，中国从来没有社会，真正的社会阶层等级概念。你从一个最普通的老百姓，只要你愿意奋斗出来，你就会被人一视同仁。所以尽管我们会发现周围有资源的人会比你更早地拥有资源，但是人生不是百米赛跑，让他们先得到好了，你给自己一辈子，这个自信人生二百年，会当击水三千里，我们也许活不到二百年，但是一百年总可以吧。所以在我大学毕业的时候，全班同学毕业典礼上，大家每个人都要上去表态，我上去说的我到今天还依依稀稀记得。我说同学们大家都很厉害，你们的学习成绩都那么好，但是请大家相信我不会放弃自己，你们做了五年的事情，我做十年，你们做十年的我做二十年，你们做二十年的我做四十年，实在不行，这辈子我要保持健康心态，保持心情愉快，身体健康，到了八十岁以后，把你们一个一个送走了，我再走。
其实人生奋斗没法比，每个人都有自己的事业，每个人都有自己的人生，最重要的什么呢？你跟自己比，就你跟自己比，你的今天是不是比昨天好，你的明天是不是比今天好，你的明年会不会比今年好，十年以后的你会不会比十年前站在这的今天的你要更好。还有的同学很有意思来问我说俞老师你看，我这个长相不怎么样，也影响了我的事业发展。比如说我去求职面试的时候，人家老板一看我长得这副挫样，他就不要我了。我说你敢这么说，说明你内心还是有点自信的，所以人是什么呢，人在三十岁以前长相可能是有一定的关系的。女孩子就算你再漂亮，过了三十岁你还能说老娘长得很妖娆吗？这感觉不对吧？就是说人是要有一点外表上的干净利落的感觉，但是到此为止了。一个男人天天在镜子面前花半个小时打扮自己，我真看到过这样的男人，半个小时都不止，我觉得男人连镜子都不应该照的。你要知道，你这么好的时间你不用在让自己的生命变得更加有魅力上面，有什么用呢？你再打扮，你能不老吗？你再打扮到年纪大了，你能皱纹不上脸吗？当你皱纹上脸的（时候），皱纹中透露出的是庸俗还是透露的是智慧，这全是你现在要做的事情，所以同学们长相跟你没关系。有一次一个小男孩，我在演讲的时候跑上来，很矮。他说俞老师，我这样一个人，在男人堆里找不到自己，在女人堆里我也找不到自己，实在太矮了，他说你看我这辈子怎么办？我说，你知道鲁迅多高吗？1米58。你知道邓小平多高吗？1米57。你知道拿破仑多高吗？1米56。我说你多高，他说我1米55，我说你知道你应该变成什么样的人了吧。
人生是自己的选择，你要把自己变成的是一个能够不是对得起自己长相，而是对得起自己的内心，对得起自己的能力的人，应该是这样去做的。所以同学们，大家一起共同努力，只要你自己相信，奋斗能让你改变自己，你的生命一定会越来越灿烂，我的演讲到此为止，谢谢大家！
尊敬的各位领导，各位评委老师，亲爱的同事们：
大家上午好！我是7号选手，今天我的演讲题目是《安全是一种幸福》。
20__年那场突如其来的汶川特大地震，以及今年发生的泥石流、洪涝灾害，在这些天灾来临的片刻，无数个生命永远地撒手而去，一时间，多少豪情壮志、多少放飞的梦想、多少美丽的依恋、多少还没有来得及回报的恩情，一切都不复存在了。生命，就在我们不经意之间，用一种悲壮、惨烈的方式诠释着她的脆弱与珍贵。
天灾，或许我们任何人都无法抗拒，但是安全却与我们息息相关。其实，在我们企业甚至车间，经常发生着各种各样的安全责任事故，今年年初，我们单位发生的“1。8”高处坠落事故，回想起那可怕的一幕，不禁让人胆战心寒。当我们静下心来，仔细分析每件事故的背后，哪一起不是因为安全责任不到位而成为事故的罪魁祸首？哪一起事故又不是因为侥幸麻痹违章操作而让我们深陷悲痛之中呢？没有安全，生命得不到保障，幸福又在哪里呢？
安全是什么？安全是企业的生命、是家庭的圆满、是工作的快乐、是单位的效益；安全是一种珍爱生命的人生态度；安全更是一种幸福！
做好安全生产工作，是企业生存发展的基本要求，是事关职工群众切身利益，事关企业发展稳定的大事。职工必须坚持“安全第一、预防为主、综合治理”的安全生产方针，在实际工作中严格遵守“三不伤害”的原则，以饱满的热情，积极的工作态度，在各自不同的岗位中奉献自己的聪明才智，为企业的发展与壮大贡献自己的一份力量。 安全不是生产指标，欠产了可以追回来。安全是人命关天的头等大事，任何一起安全责任事故，不仅给单位造成经济损失，更是会给我们职工的精神造成巨大创伤，安全工作出了人身事故，想弥补的机会都没有了。
因违规操作而付出了生命的代价，却给活着的人留下了无尽的哀伤，父母失去了年轻的儿子，让白发苍苍的父母在本该安度晚年的幸福生活中如何去承受老年丧子的悲痛；年轻的妻子失去了心爱的丈夫，成为她一生中难以抚平的伤痛；年幼待哺的孩子再无法享受到父亲那博大深厚的关爱。
这一切无疑不是在告诉我们：生命不仅属于你自己，生命也属于你的父母、你的爱人、你的孩子以及所有那些关心爱护你的亲人和朋友们。珍爱生命，杜绝安全责任事故的发生，就是最大的幸福！
历数以往发生的大大小小的事故，无一不与粗心、疏忽、违章操作有关。其实，工作时一丝不苟，严格遵守操作规程，遵守规章制度，杜绝违章作业，我们就离安全很近很近。每道工序、每个岗位都不是孤立存在的，岗位与岗位、人与人之间存在相互关联，相互照应的，当有人违章操作时，当看到不安全行为时，我们温馨及时的提醒和制止，又可以最大化的远离安全事故！
安全是生命的基石，安全是回家的路途。牢记安全，我们每一名职工才能高高兴兴上班来，平平安安回家去，我们每一个家庭就会更加欢乐更加幸福！
我们需要生命，我们追求幸福，我们选择安全！
安全就是一种幸福！
Look, I had second thoughts, really, about whether I could talk about this to such a vital and alive audience as you guys. Then I remembered the quote from Gloria Steinem, which goes, "The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off." (Laughter) So -- (Laughter)
So with that in mind, I'm going to set about trying to do those things here, and talk about dying in the 21st century. Now the first thing that will piss you off, undoubtedly, is that all of us are, in fact, going to die in the 21st century. There will be no exceptions to that. There are, apparently, about one in eight of you who think you're immortal, on surveys, but -- (Laughter) Unfortunately, that isn't going to happen.
While I give this talk, in the next 10 minutes, a hundred million of my cells will die, and over the course of today, 2,000 of my brain cells will die and never come back, so you could argue that the dying process starts pretty early in the piece.
Anyway, the second thing I want to say about dying in the 21st century, apart from it's going to happen to everybody, is it's shaping up to be a bit of a train wreck for most of us, unless we do something to try and reclaim this process from the rather inexorable trajectory that it's currently on.
So there you go. That's the truth. No doubt that will piss you off, and now let's see whether we can set you free. I don't promise anything. Now, as you heard in the intro, I work in intensive care, and I think I've kind of lived through the heyday of intensive care. It's been a ride, man. This has been fantastic. We have machines that go ping. There's many of them up there. And we have some wizard technology which I think has worked really well, and over the course of the time I've worked in intensive care, the death rate for males in Australia has halved, and intensive care has had something to do with that. Certainly, a lot of the technologies that we use have got something to do with that.
So we have had tremendous success, and we kind of got caught up in our own success quite a bit, and we started using expressions like "lifesaving." I really apologize to everybody for doing that, because obviously, we don't. What we do is prolong people's lives, and delay death, and redirect death, but we can't, strictly speaking, save lives on any sort of permanent basis.
And what's really happened over the period of time that I've been working in intensive care is that the people whose lives we started saving back in the '70s, '80s, and '90s, are now coming to die in the 21st century of diseases that we no longer have the answers to in quite the way we did then.
So what's happening now is there's been a big shift in the way that people die, and most of what they're dying of now isn't as amenable to what we can do as what it used to be like when I was doing this in the '80s and '90s.
So we kind of got a bit caught up with this, and we haven't really squared with you guys about what's really happening now, and it's about time we did. I kind of woke up to this bit in the late '90s when I met this guy. This guy is called Jim, Jim Smith, and he looked like this. I was called down to the ward to see him. His is the little hand. I was called down to the ward to see him by a respiratory physician. He said, "Look, there's a guy down here. He's got pneumonia, and he looks like he needs intensive care. His daughter's here and she wants everything possible to be done." Which is a familiar phrase to us. So I go down to the ward and see Jim, and his skin his translucent like this. You can see his bones through the skin. He's very, very thin, and he is, indeed, very sick with pneumonia, and he's too sick to talk to me, so I talk to his daughter Kathleen, and I say to her, "Did you and Jim ever talk about what you would want done if he ended up in this kind of situation?" And she looked at me and said,
"No, of course not!" I thought, "Okay. Take this steady." And I got talking to her, and after a while, she said to me, "You know, we always thought there'd be time."
Jim was 94. (Laughter) And I realized that something wasn't happening here. There wasn't this dialogue going on that I imagined was happening. So a group of us started doing survey work, and we looked at four and a half thousand nursing home residents in Newcastle, in the Newcastle area, and discovered that only one in a hundred of them had a plan about what to do when their hearts stopped beating. One in a hundred. And only one in 500 of them had plan about what to do if they became seriously ill. And I realized, of course, this dialogue is definitely not occurring in the public at large.
各位嘉宾、各位同仁：
新年伊始，万象更新，又一个生机勃发的春天向我们走来。凭借员工们的热心、爱护和培育，我们公司才有了今天的规模，值此辞旧迎新之际，我谨代表购物广场董事会向大家在过去一年中辛勤的工作表示衷心的感谢，感谢员工们，感谢那些实践过去的一年，是我们公司骄傲与辉煌的一年，是硕果累累的一年。在领导的带领下，广大员工备受鼓舞，沿着公司发展方向，兢兢业业，努力拼搏，爱岗敬业，努力干好本职工作。
喜讯连连，捷报频传，我们公司在今年9月份新成立了一家分店《购物广撤，让我们的前途一片光明，让大家有了更好的发展前途。
雄关漫道真如铁，而今迈步从头越。展望新的一年，面对更多的挑战，更多的竞争，还有更多的机会摆在我们面前。然而面对新的一年，我们信心百倍，激情满怀，充满了自信和豪迈，面对艰巨繁重的任务，面对日益激烈的市场竞争，我们一定要增强忧患意识，居安思危，艰苦奋斗，勇于面对挑战，善于抓住机遇，进一步解放思想，实事求是，与时俱进，共同开创公司发展的新局面！为实现公司提出的奋斗目标而努力拼搏！更好！
千帆竞进，百舸争流。希望员工们更加刻苦学习，乐于奉献，完善自我，很好地掌握岗位知识，树立好客隆公司更加美好的形象，创造更加美好的未来！
我们的新春之愿是：愿我们的好客隆像巨龙般腾飞，愿我们的事业像鲜花般绚丽多彩，愿我们的公司像磐石般坚强稳固，愿我们的员工像强力胶一样紧密团结，愿我们的生活像蜂蜜般甘甜圆满。让我们共同祝愿：好客隆的未来更加美好！
祝愿我们的事业兴旺发达！祝愿我们的公司繁荣昌盛！再一次衷心地祝愿，祝全体员工：新年快乐，工作顺利，身心安康，事业有成，生活美满，合家幸福！
Everyone has their own dreams 。 Someone wants to be a teacher 。Someonewants to be a singer 。Let me tell you something about my dream。
Well, I want to be a doctor when I grow up 。First，I think doctor is aintersting job and I am interested in it 。And doctor can help people who areillness . I want to help them and make them feel happy . So I must work harder.
What's your dream ? Can you tell me?
每个人都有自己的梦想。有的人想做一名老师。有的人想做一名歌手。让我告诉你一些关于我的梦想的事。
是这样的，当我长大后我想做一名医生。首先，我认为医生是个有趣的工作并且我对他感兴趣。医生能帮助生病的人。我想帮助他们并且使他们快乐。所以我必须更加努力的学习。
你的梦想是什么？你能告诉我吗？