季度绩效英文自我评价（通用4篇）
In many enterprises performance appraisal, there is a "staff self-assessment" link, which is the first employee of their performance in the assessment period, and then submitted to the direct superior to adjust, and finally draw the employee's performance scores. In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?
First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.
Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.
Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.
Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.
So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.
We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.
Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.
In summary, the core issue of employee self-evaluation, not how to do a good job, but when to engage in, when should not engage in the problem. It is necessary to distinguish the stage of development of enterprise performance management and select the key points that should be solved at each stage, and will not achieve the multiplier effect without being trapped in form. From the initial stage of performance management to the advanced stage, each enterprise has a long way to go, and this process can not be achieved overnight.
To do a mechanic, to deal with their work to understand a clear, familiar and skilled in their own work. Have all the machines and equipment to understand, but also have the ability to respond to failure, deal with the equipment may occur at any time failure. To meet the needs of the production schedule, our unit of equipment, although the new equipment, but also frequent failures, such as machine washing machine, no major problems, minor problems in the maintenance process, and gradually improve the machine cleaning Machine awareness, so that small problems can be dealt with quickly, as well as liquid sandblasting machine, in use, there is always a failure to plug the nozzle, so that can not work, broken through the brain, after operator description Cause of the failure, my analysis, the glass beads used in diameter than in the past, and the specifications are not uniform, resulting in a blocked nozzle, after a bold improvement, increasing the nozzle aperture, the liquid blasting machine is normal work ,
The tunnel cleaning machine, always produces the transmission chain does not move, before the adjustment of friction, you can, but once, how to adjust the friction, does not work, after analysis, that the friction coefficient is not enough, Found, and sure enough inside the oil, after careful cleaning, remove the oil, everything is normal, and so a series of maintenance work, we must understand the principle of equipment in order to good maintenance, which is my years of experience in maintenance , I do not understand, I have to try to study, once understood, they suddenly realized, looks complicated, as long as understand, it will be simple, I not only bear the equipment maintenance work, but also completed a lot of tooling Production, for example, several engine-based experimental bench design, mobile engine racks, and so on dozens of pieces, this year we re-manufacturing engine varieties increased a lot, not before these test benches, the workshop down
The task, we immediately accept, and actively to complete, from conception, to the leadership through the design intent, and then cutting the welding, production, and so on, until the engine is placed, commissioning, delivery, each engine model Of the experiment to go through our first course, like the troops did not move for the first horse, when the civil servants of the various engines in the production of my bench to test, I feel very honored, thank the leadership to me Such a platform, but also feel the work of their labor and excitement, but also for the development of our manufacturing pride, but these will make me work harder, modest and prudent to learn from others, as far as possible to improve their ability to work , So that their own positions in the play to the greatest effect, faster and more efficient to complete their own work, but also enable us to get the maximum benefit units, so that my work and the harvest of workers can achieve a balance , So I am more motivated, more confident work.
And other colleagues of interpersonal relationships is also important, because a person's ability is limited, the success of each thing is by the collective wisdom, and colleagues together is the successful completion of leadership to the work of the premise, which It is not just work, but also in daily life. So it is not only personal but also a duty to work together. I have a good relationship with my colleagues. I often help each other because I only have one mechanic. There is a power maintenance workers, a good relationship, and I work with all my colleagues, I have great respect at work, mutual cooperation, is to improve a lot of efficiency, for example, in the oil depot anti-theft window, the test station Door, in the production of sandblasting between the asbestos roof when the rain, give sandblasting between the welding air pressure pipe, we collectively work together, mutual cooperation, active, so that the task is completed very quickly, and this is the power of unity , To play the power of everyone in order to make work progress faster. I deeply understand.
In the repair of the old and waste conservation, but also everywhere carefully, in the production of rain roof, with the waste angle, in the welding air pressure pipe, the use of the waste plant threading pipe,
In many enterprises performance appraisal, there is a "staff self-assessment" link, which is the first employee of their performance in the assessment period, and then submitted to the direct superior to adjust, and finally draw the employee's performance scores. In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?
First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.
Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.
Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.
Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.
So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.
We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.
Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.
In summary, the core issue of employee self-evaluation, not how to do a good job, but when to engage in, when should not engage in the problem. It is necessary to distinguish the stage of development of enterprise performance management and select the key points that should be solved at each stage, and will not achieve the multiplier effect without being trapped in form. From the initial stage of performance management to the advanced stage, each enterprise has a long way to go, and this process can not be achieved overnight.
Blink of an eye, six months later. Over the past six months, I have successfully transitioned from one student to one of China Mobile's employees. Six months ago, China Mobile chose me, but also I chose China Mobile. From the company into the day, I continue to warn myself that they must be "high standards and strict requirements." Facts have proved that in this very substantial months, I was hard and happy, a great harvest,
Sentiment deep. More importantly, I am proud of my ability to work in such a fast paced, efficient, vibrant and dynamic business.
Recalling the past few months, I mainly do the following work:
First, in the second half of the main work
(A) the Office of the internship work
Mobile Office is a mobile company directly to customers of a window, where the staff is the mobile front-line staff, dealing directly with customers, directly on behalf of the mobile image. In more than two months of the operating room front desk internship, I not only see the front desk staff work seriously and the passion of life, but also feel the kind of home company with a strong sense of responsibility and a sense of belonging. In particular, I not only on the front of the business process with the most basic familiar with, but also on the front desk staff have a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding. Business, in addition to the normal charges, for business and other work, the reception of users, coordination, resolve contradictions, counseling, complaints and other complaints also play an important role; salesperson duties, high level of business and coordination of work, Strong sense of responsibility, modest working attitude, the spirit of team operations, service enthusiasm is the measure of the basic principles of excellent front desk staff. Which are reflected in China Mobile what kind of employees.
The rise of perceptual knowledge to rational knowledge is the further sublimation of epistemology. Therefore, after a period of internship in the front, according to company arrangements, we participated in the provincial company new staff of the fourth training. The training activities, although not a long time, only ten days, but rich in content and form of flexibility. Both theoretical study, but also to develop training. Especially in the leadership lectures, the introduction of "China Mobile needs what kind of staff", let me remember:
1, a strong sense of innovation;
2, the spirit of hard work;
3, the pursuit of perfection;
4, modest and prudent attitude.
Thus, only we move every employee to play an innovative subjective initiative, and pay attention to the bit by bit from our side, the real play to their combat effectiveness, in order to make the company and society should contribute. In the scorching sun in deep Nanshan Lake expansion training base, and colleagues surmount, make me understand the team fighting is all-powerful - "as long as the victory over yourself, you win the life."